Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Credit Card Issuers continue to find ways to make extra profits


Many of us were hopeful that the Credit Card Act of 2009 would finally put an end to the abusive tactics of card issuers. Some methods used to garner fees seem down right criminal, and an Act of Congress was needed to stop them. But, like adage goes about plucking a grey hair, you take one out, and two more sprout back up in its place.

In the past year, card issues have created new ways to collect millions more in fees each year, many of which are hidden to consumers, unless you pore over your credit card statement.

Credit card issuers are going to more than ever try to find ways to make extra profits. New charges and changes to the way fees are calculated are adding to the balances of a growing number of cardholders. While some of the practices were instituted after the Credit CARD Act was approved in May, others were quietly being put in place earlier as a result of the recession. The one thing they have in common is that none of them are explicitly prohibited by the Credit CARD Act.

Under the Credit Card act, consumers with fixed rate credit cards will not have rates changed on current balances if they pay on time – but, the majority of cardholders carry variable rate cars, which could leave them exposed to risk of a rate increase. The rate on these cards is usually calculated by taking the prime rate, and then adding to it a risk spread. Historically, the prime rate used was the highest in the month. However, many issuers have amended their terms this year, so they can now select the highest prime rate in the previous 90 day cycle, which the Center estimates can cost consumers $720 million a year. It’s so hidden and obscure that it can’t be interpreted as anything other than a way to extract money from people in ways they don’t understand.

In addition, although historically the rate on cards floated freely with the prime rate, many issuers have now set “floors”, to limit how low a cardholder’s variable rate can go. Ultimately, what we’re seeing here is that the legislation may have the best intentions of the consumers in mind, but it lacks the breadth necessary to offer any real protection. The major of customers are still exposed to unexplained rate increases, and fees that they just will not understand.

Monday, December 14, 2009

2009's Top Money Saving Sites


Most of us are cutting back on the small luxuries in order to make our dollar go a little further these days - and we're also becoming much savvier with our shopping choices.  But, somehow, no matter how much we try, the holiday season seems to be one time of the year when we all seem to blow our budget.  So, we make New Years Resolutions to get back on track, to cut back on the things we really don't need, and find ways to save a buck or two on the things we really do need.


One way a lot of us are making our buck go a little further is by taking advantage of the offers on Money Saving sites 


FatWallet.com
Consider FatWallet the mother of all money-saving sites. It combines a deal forum, coupon search, and in-house cash back program, making it a one-stop destination for all things bargain-related. Though it specializes in online deals and sales, you can also use FatWallet for comparing other purchases too, like seeing which gym offers the cheapest membership, which car company offers the best rebates to combine with the government’s new cash-for-clunkers program, or where to find cheap lobster.


toolzdo.com
ToolzDo is a global community comprised of local neighborhoods with members who love to show neighborly love, keep more cash, live wiser and better.

To help the community keep more cash, ToolzDo provides a One-Stop Shop for all reuse of stuff in the home and office. The only place on the web you can rent, share, swap, give & get free stuff; from electronics to power tools and designer bags. Did we mention furniture, clothes, toys, strollers, books, food, home improvement materials, space, and much more. With ToolzDo, it's all in one place.

Dealhack.com
Dealhack call themselves the hottest site to get insider deals on consumer and tech products.  On Dealhack, you'll find specials, coupons, rebates, buyer's guides and lots of cool stuff. We've organized the site so you can search for something specific or just browse.




Retailmenot.com
Retailmenot is a great site, where you can search for local and national coupons for just about everything you can think of.  Retailmenot also has a Social Network  where you can connect with other shoppers so you get the best coupons, offers and deals. Share the fashions you love, hook up for shopping events, see what coupons your friends are using, add your favorite deals, make a wishlist for all your friends to see and more! 


BensBargains.com
Bens Bargains is similar to a lot of other coupon sites, it doesn't offer anything flashy, but it sure does display some great coupons and links to great bargains on retailer sites, and you can even compare prices if your searching for a bargain on something in particular.



Woot.com
Technically, it’s an online retailer, but Woot qualifies for our list thanks to unique selling format, community atmosphere and, well, 99 percent of the stuff it sells it an absolute steal. Woot runs on a deal-a-day format with only one item on sale per day, and when they’re gone, they’re gone. You’ll find everything from flashlights to fire alarms cropping up on the site, but even when the product disappoints, Woot’s spiced-up product descriptions usually never fail to elicit a smile. Just don’t buy when you’re in a hurry – shipping can sometimes take ages.


Kashless.com
Craigslist and Freecycle both offer amazing lists of items other folks are giving away entirely for free, but Kashless aggregates both into one seamless feed of no-catch freebies. It also adds some unique extras, like sharing listings on Facebook and Twitter (”This free fridge would be perfect to convert into a kegerator!”) and even real-time text notifications when items you’re looking for are posted. Having scored free firewood, air conditioning units and hot tubs on Craigslist before, we can safely say there’s a bounty out there.


TotallyFreeStuff.com
You probably spot offers for free samples all day long on billboards, newspaper ads, TV commercials and other mediums, but what if you wanted to look at them all in one spot and find some stuff you actually wanted to try? TotallyFreeStuff posts everything from free stuff you sign up for online, to items you buy at a store in mail in rebates for, and contests to win the really big stuff. You’ll have to cut through some junk to find the stuff with the fewest catches, but it’s one of the most comprehensive listings out there. And hey, it’s free.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

When buying a new Auto, Steer Clear of the Rule of 78s



This is one rebate auto shoppers should avoid.

Some auto lenders still use the archaic and costly "Rule of 78s" formula to calculate a rebate of finance charges when a customer pays off a loan early. This rebate is actually a sneaky prepayment penalty.


"The Rule of 78s is a historical anachronism," says David Rubinstein, vice president of the Virginia Citizens Consumer Council. "It's simply another way of padding a loan."

The Rule of 78s is a mathematical formula that was devised in the days before modern calculators. The formula was a quick way for lenders in the 1920s and 1930s to estimate payoff amounts when a customer paid ahead on an installment loan. It's still around today.

Also known as the sum-of-the-digits method, the Rule of 78s gets its name from the sum of the digits one through 12 -- the number of months in a year.

Wrong way
For a borrower looking to end an auto loan early, there isn't a worse way a lender could calculate your payoff amount. The Rule of 78s formula packs extra interest charges into the early months of a loan. Using Rule of 78s, a lender typically collects three-quarters of a loan's interest in the first half of a loan term.

There are two basic types of auto loans: simple interest loans and pre-computed loans. The Rule of 78s can only be applied to pre-computed loans that are paid ahead of schedule. To understand why this is such a lousy deal for consumers, you have to understand how a pre-computed loan works.

With a pre-computed loan, the interest owed over the life of the loan is calculated using a standard amortization table. Once you sign on the dotted line for this type of loan, you're obligated to pay back principal plus the full amount of interest that will accrue over the entire term of the loan.

To sum up, interest on a pre-computed loan is calculated in advance and you're on the hook for every penny of it when you sign.

In contrast, with a simple-interest loan you're charged interest each day based on the balance you owe. So the quicker you pay down your balance the less interest you pay. A simple interest loan with no prepayment penalties rewards customers who pay ahead.

Pay ahead with a pre-computed loan that applies the "Rule of 78s" method to prepayments and you'll be slammed with a penalty, disguised as a rebate.

Caution: Interest padding ahead
Let's say you're ready to pay off your 48-month auto loan a year early. Because you signed on for a pre-computed loan, you're on the hook for 48 months worth of interest even though you're paying off the loan in 36 months.
But your lender is going to do you a "favor." You don't have to pay 48 months worth of interest. Instead, he's going to determine your payout amount including a "rebate" for those 12 months worth of finance charges you won't have to pay.
But your payout amount won't be what you deserve. The reason? Using the "Rule of 78s" method, your lender applies more of your previous payments toward interest and less of your previous payments toward principal.
Since less is applied toward principal, the amount you owe will be higher than expected. The earlier you try to pay off one of these loans the more you'll have to pay. The higher the interest rate, the more that payoff amount is going to hurt.
"If it had overcharged the lender and undercharged the consumer, it would have disappeared decades ago," says Jean Ann Fox, director of consumer protection for Consumer Federation of America.
"It's a dirty little secret."

Turning on the warning lights
In 1992, the U.S. Congress outlawed the use of the "Rule of 78s" formula in closed-end loans longer than 61 months.
"It just gets very egregious with a longer-term loan," says Elizabeth Renuart, staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center.

States outlawing use of the Rule of 78s formula in installment loans of five years and less:

Arizona
Michigan
Delaware
Minnesota
Idaho
Nebraska
Iowa
Nevada
Kansas
New Hampshire
Maine
New York
Maryland
Oregon
Massachusetts
South Dakota

Vermont

Source: CARLAW, a monthly legal reporting service for legal compliance specialists in the automobile industry.
Whether a lender can apply the "Rule of 78s" method to installment loans of five years or less is a matter of state law. Currently, 17 states prohibit the practice.
Earlier last year, U.S. Rep. John LaFalce, D-N.Y., introduced a bill (H.R. 1054) that would eliminate the use of the Rule of 78s formula in credit transactions.
Fortunately for consumers, simple interest loans are now the norm in the auto financing business. The vast majority of auto lenders do not use pre-computed auto loans and they do not use the Rule of 78s method to calculate prepayments.
"The Rule of 78s as it applies to installment auto sales is a relic of the past," says David Robertson, executive director of the Association of Finance and Insurance Professionals.
"In today's mainstream market, that would be an absolute rarity."
The pre-computed Rule of 78s auto loans that do exist today tend to be found in the subprime market. Folks with less-than-perfect credit should be on the lookout.
"Buy here, pay here" auto lots and lenders that specialize in offering loans to borrowers with badly damaged credit may offer these consumer-unfriendly loans.
"All the ones I've seen have had really high interest rates," says Mark Eskeldson, an auto expert and author of CarInfo.com, a consumer information and advocacy Web site.
"If a car dealer is trying to put you into a rule of 78s loan it's fairly safe to assume that the dealer has packed your interest rate -- he's inflated it."





Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Personal Bankruptcy filing surges




The number of Americans filing personal bankruptcies surged 9% in October and were on target for the highest annual total in four years, according to a report issued Wednesday.
The American Bankruptcy Institute, an industry research firm that relies on data from the National Bankruptcy Research Center, said 135,914 consumers filed for bankruptcy last month. Almost a third of the bankruptcies were filed under Chapter 13, in which consumers are put on a repayment plan of up to five years.
"The nearly 9% increase in consumer bankruptcy filings in October, together with a 7% jump reported in business cases, demonstrates the sustained stress on the U.S. economy," said ABI executive director Samuel Gerdano.
The group forecasts total bankruptcies to exceed 1.4 million in 2009, which would be the highest since 2005. It would also be an increase of at least 30% from last year.
"People are still carrying a lot of debt in terms of credit cards and home equity loans, and unemployment is still rising," said Maureen Thompson, legislative director for the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys in Washington. "All of those factors are hitting consumers at the exact same time."
While some Americans are able to survive by tapping into savings and retirement funds, Thompson said many middle-income families are struggling after becoming unemployed for longer than anticipated. And with their homes values lower, interest rates creeping higher and credit lines reducing, they are being forced to declare bankruptcy.
The last time bankruptcies were this high was due to a change in the law rather than deteriorating economic circumstances. In October 2005, Congress implemented legislation making it harder for consumers to prove that they should be allowed to clear their debts in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, forcing more to file under Chapter 13.
To dodge the change, Americans rushed to file for bankruptcy in the months before the law went into effect.
Thompson said an economy that puts people back to work will begin to lower the number of Americans filing for bankruptcy, but she is "not expecting the numbers to turn around in the foreseeable future." To top of page

Monday, November 2, 2009

CIT Bankrupcy means more than a $2.3 billion wipeout for the Treasury



For over 100 years, CIT has provided lending, leasing & advisory services to small and middle market businesses. The bankruptcy of CIT ranks amongst the largest in American corporate history, and means a $2.3 billion wipeout for Treasury - and its not just the enormous cost to the taxpayer and private investors that is going to affect us.

CIT plays an important behind-the-scenes role in the retail industry, with about 60% of retailers depending in CIT for financing. In the last few weeks, the nation's stores have begun filling their floors with holiday merchandise, but they still need a reliable source of lending to prevent shipping disruptions and to restock after the holidays. Even one day that vendors are cut off from much-needed financing could create a bottleneck, resulting in shipments of merchandise left on docks or in vendors' warehouses.

CIT expects to emerge from bankruptcy by the end of the year, but a dragged-out case or any glitches could further disrupt the already tight credit markets for retailers, said Joe Alouf, a partner with Eaglepoint Advisors, a crisis management company that is partly owned by Kurt Salmon Associates.

"CIT is the 600-pound gorilla in the industry," Alouf said.

Craig Sherman, vice president of government affairs at the National Retail Federation, thinks the industry "dodged a bullet on the holiday season" for the most part, because most merchandise is in stores' distribution centers. However, he said CIT's woes could throw a wrench in ordering for the important 2010 spring season. NRF officials say that as stores prepare for a rebound in consumer spending next year, access to credit is very important.

Harold Reichwald, co-chair of law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips' banking group, said that CIT's case will likely force the company's customers to look elsewhere for financing.

"If I was a small businessman, I would say to myself, 'I have to find alternatives,'" Reichwald said. "In this marketplace, there isn't a lot of alternatives."

CIT's Chapter 11 filing is one of the biggest in U.S. corporate history, following Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual, WorldCom and General Motors. The bankruptcy filing shows $71 billion in finance and leasing assets against total debt of $64.9 billion. The move wipes out current holders of its common and preferred stock, meaning the U.S. government will likely lose the $2.3 billion in taxpayer funds it sunk into CIT last year to prop up the company.

The government could have lost billions more, however, had it not declined to hand over more aid to the company earlier this year. Treasury Department spokesman Andrew Williams said Sunday that the government will be closely monitoring the bankruptcy proceedings, but acknowledged that "recovery to preferred and common equityholders will be minimal."

Friday, October 30, 2009

8 Good Things about Bad Times


I was reading RedBook Magazine this morning, (www.redbookmag.com) and I came across an article focusing on the upside of recession living, with a few real life examples of couples that have had some tough changes to deal with in the past twelve months due to the impact the recession has had on our economy.   I found these tips from the article to be  a healthy outlook on living with a reduced (or no) income during tough times.  

8 good things about bad times
Tighter times don't necessarily equal doom and gloom — and cutting back doesn't have to hurt. Here, a few reasons to love living on less:

You finally have the time to check out your local museums, historical sites, and parks during your staycation.

You discover that you're still killer at Boggle/Scrabble/gin rummy.

Rather than wasting time shopping online, you waste time filling your Netflix queue: Much cheaper, and everything fits perfectly!

You're no longer stressed out about what you don't have. Instead, you feel good and grateful for what you do have.

You realize that generic products really do work just as well as name-brand ones.

Spending less and saving more gives you an incredible feeling of control over your finances. (Priceless!)

Who needs Starbucks? Folgers is better than you remembered!

You actually have a good excuse to invite your girlfriends over for a cheap bottle of wine: Instead of shopping, it's clothing-swap time.

Monday, October 26, 2009

Recession Dinners


I stumbled upon this site today, called 5dollardinners.com which features family dinners, all made for $5 or less!  I am sure you will agree, this is an amazing feat, and in this economy, many families are looking for healthy, economical ways to prepare home cooked meals, while still sticking to our household budgets.

The recipes on the site are probably not going to suit all tastes, but, for $5, you can hardly expect foie gras and lobster.  What you can expect though, is honest home style food, made from basic ingredients that most of us have in our pantry, and ingredients that won't break the bank.

The very talented lady behind this site -  Erin Chase,  has a book in the works, which will be released in  January by St. Martins Press.  She's also been a guest on the Rachael Ray Show, and has an amazing following of fans of the $5 dinner.  In this economy, that doesn't surprise me!

I'm going to road test her repertoire of recipes this week, starting with her "Autumn Chicken" recipe which looks tasty and easy to make.   So if your interested in inexpensive meal choices, check out this site!

Saturday, October 24, 2009

The $25 a week goal


A lot of people are reconsidering their spending habits lately.  The economic crisis of the past twelve months has changed our culture forever, and, regardless of how soon or how quick we bounce back, the fact is, most of us, at some point over the past twelve months, have taken the time to identify whats important, and whats not in our lives, and take stock of our financial situation.

I set myself a personal goal to try to cut down on my own spending by at least $25 a week.

So how have I cut back?  To start with, I no longer purchase my daily Cafe Latte  on the way to work.  This alone saves me about $15.00 a week/$60.00 month.  I also try to take my lunch to the office a few days a week - which often helps me be more productive by having a working lunch.  That saves me about $30.00 a week/$120.00 month.    I've re-examined my grocery shopping habits, and I buy in bulk at a Wholesale Club once a month, and in between, I've discovered some really good quality and inexpensive fruit and vegetable stores and butchers in my local community that have great bargains, and quality, seasonal product.  Changing my grocery shopping habits has saved me about $100.00 week/$400.00 month.   I am more conscious of my utility bills, and I keep our air conditioning set to 76 degrees, which, makes a  difference to our electricity bill.  I reviewed our family cell phone plan, and observed our call habits over a 3 month period, and discovered we didn't need anywhere near as many minutes as our plan offered - so I changed our plan to less minutes and that saved $100 a month.   We still eat out from time to time, but overall, we're much more conscious about what we spend, and on what.  And, we found that it was easier than we thought to save a little bit extra each week by just changing our habits.


In total, I'm saving around $680.00 a month, just by changing a few of my spending habits, and sacrificing a few things, such as my morning Latte.  And in 30 years time, if I continue to save that $680.00 a month and put it in a savings account at 5% interest, I will have saved $568,973.00 made up of  $245,480.00 in accumulated savings and an additional $323,493.94 in accumulated interest!

The BallPark E$timate


I stumbled upon a neat site today,which features a cool tool for retirement called the BallPark Estimate.

What is the Ballpark E$timate?

The Ballpark E$timate is an easy-to-use, two-page worksheet that helps you quickly identify approximately how much you need to save to fund a comfortable retirement. The Ballpark E$timate takes complicated issues like projected Social Security benefits and earnings assumptions on savings, and turns them into language and mathematics that are easy to understand. A lot of us are reevaluating our retirement savings plans, and, taking into account how our investments have done over the last twelve months, most of us are finding we're needing to put aside extra savings in order to meet our retirement goals. This site is a cool tool and worthwhile checking out.

Check out http://www.choosetosave.org/ballpark/

Friday, October 23, 2009

Auto Loans: What YOU need to know


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Few of us have the means to write a check for the full amount of a new - or even used - vehicle.

Unfortunately, car buyers, treating financing as an afterthought in the car buying transaction, can easily waste thousands of dollars.

Here are some tips on what to do and what to avoid.

Know your incentives
Web sites like Edmunds.com (which provides automotive data for CNN's Web sites) list available incentives in your area. Often there are low-interest, or even zero-percent, financing deals you might qualify for.

Don't assume you need perfect credit. Ford Motor Co. (Charts), for example, has recently opened up its zero-percent financing incentive to buyers with a few potholes in their credit history.

Don't go in empty-handed
Hybrid vehicles top fuel economy list
It's true that a car company's "captive finance arm," - for example, Ford Motor Credit or Toyota Motor Credit - will probably be able to offer you a better financing deal than an outside bank or credit union. After all, it's their job to help you buy one of their parent company's products.

But that's not automatic. It can't hurt to make them work a little for your business by researching the cheapest financing you can get before you go to the dealership. A credit union or an organization like AAA or USAA can sometimes offer you access to rates you couldn't get at a regular bank.

Companies like Capital One Auto Finance will even allow you to bring a check to the dealership without having to agree to take the loan. The loan doesn't start until you write the check, which can be up to a pre-approved amount. Until then, all you've done is arranged competitive financing. You can still take it or leave it.

Just don't forget that interest rates are negotiable. If you arrange financing at a car dealership, part of that interest goes to the dealership itself. The dealership's business manager also has an incentive to work with you to earn your business.

Don't get stretched
Before you go car shopping, you have to know how much car you can afford. That means you need to know how much of a down payment you can make, how much you're likely to get for your current car and how much your monthly payments will be.

It's tempting to just let the dealership work it all out for you.

In that scenario, you tell the salesman what kind of monthly payment you're looking for and show them your trade-in. They'll tell you whether you should stick with the entry-level model or if you can move up a step or two. And you'll probably be pleasantly surprised that you can drive a much nicer car than you thought for monthly payments that fit your budget. Yes, the loan stretches out for six years but... look at this car! Feel those seats. Listen to that big, strong V8. Come on, if you can afford it each month, who cares how long the loan is?

Well, obviously, another year or two of payments means thousands of extra dollars out of your pocket. It's just being removed more gently.

Then there's another problem you might find out about years later. The longer your car loan is, the longer you'll be "upside down" in your car payments. In other words, a longer loan extends the period during which you'll owe more on the car than the car is worth.

So figure out your payment situation and know what you can afford before you start shopping.

Do your own math
Once the deal's all figured out, there's one simple step a lot of people forget to take. Get out your pocket calculator and figure out how much that car is really costing you.

Just multiply your monthly payment by the number of payments you'll be making. Then add on your down payment and the value of your trade-in. If you were fortunate enough to qualify for zero-percent financing, there shouldn't be any surprises.

If you're paying interest, especially if you've taken out a long-term loan, you might be shocked by how much that car is costing you.

For example, a six year loan at 7.9 percent on a $35,000 car would cost you almost $10,000 more than the same vehicle if you were paying no interest, according to Edmunds.com.

Then you can decide if that car is really worth almost $45,000.

5 Evil things Credit Card Companies can still do !


The Bill
Credit card companies are socking it to consumers left and right.
They're hiking interest rates to as much as 36% and doubling minimum monthly payments, frustrating customers who are already cash-strapped and credit-crunched.


In an effort to curb these abusive practices, President Obama signed into law a credit card reform act in May that's rolling out in three parts over 12 months.

At the same time, credit card companies have been hard at work coming up with new ways to boost profits while sidestepping the reforms.

"Card issuers are making sure they can make up the lost money in new ways," said Bill Hardekopf of Lowcards.com, a research company funded by a commercial debt collector.

The first part of the law, which took effect in August, requires banks to give customers more notice ahead of major changes to their accounts, like rate hikes. Starting in February, limits will be imposed on when issuers can raise rates on existing card balances, and on new cards. In August 2010 some credit card penalty fees will be will reined in.

But no legislation can fully shield consumers from the credit card industry's ongoing efforts to boost the bottom line.

The worst part? "All of these hikes are taking place simply because they can," Hardekopf said.

(1) Interest Rate Hikes
Interest rates are out of this world.
"They've increased steadily over the past 5 years, and in general are higher than they've ever been," said Josh Frank, senior researcher at the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), who says he's seen annual percentage rates as high as 36%.

No current laws cap credit card interest rates, according to Pamela Banks of Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports, so technically the sky's the limit.

But the CARD act will help curb abusive practices. As of February, issuers won't be able to arbitrarily raise rates on existing balances. But cardholders will still be subject to interest hikes for late payments and various other infractions.

And card companies will be able to raise their rates as high as they want, whenever they want, on future purchases even after the reform bill kicks in completely.

The act will bring protections for new customers; issuers will no longer be able to hike rates on new accounts in the first 12 months, unless the borrower is delinquent by more than 60 days or the increase is stated in the contract.

Keven Vallance recently had the rate on his Sears card increase from 9.99% to 13.99% for no apparent reason. When Vallance called Sears Credit, which is owned by Citibank, a rep told him every cardholder's rate is increasing by 4%.

Citi spokesman Samuel Wang said in an email that the company has "adjusted pricing and card terms for some customers as part of our regular account reviews."

Consumer outrage is boiling over. Last month, a disgruntled Bank of America customer posted a YouTube video complaining her bank "jacked up my interest rate to a whopping 30% APR." Her rant went viral, and BofA dropped her rate back to its original 12.99%.

(2)New Fees
Fees aren't just rising -- they're multiplying. Cardholders are getting slapped with fees they've never seen before.
The hitch: New laws can address only existing fees and business practices; they can't predict what credit card companies will do in the future.

"Theoretically, they could create a fee for names that begin with 'J,'" said Lowcards.com's Hardekopf.

In reality, customers are seeing new annual fees, inactivity charges and more. Not of these charges are unheard of, but many fees that were unusual are becoming commonplace.

Earlier this month, for instance, some Bank of America customers were shocked to learn that their no-fee credit cards would be subject to a new annual fee.

BofA spokeswoman Betty Riess said the fees are part of a company test that affects 0.5% of all consumer accounts, and that the fees range from $29-$99.

The charges will be levied in February, and Reiss said that customers were chosen "based on risk and profitability," but added that they have the option to reject the fees by canceling their accounts.

Fifth Third Bank recently introduced a $19 inactivity fee for customers who don't charge anything for 12 months, and Citibank is hitting some consumers with a fee if they put less than $2,400 on their card annually.

To address this problem, House Financial Services Committee Barney Frank (D-Mass.) has proposed a new regulatory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which would approve new credit card fees. While the House Financial Service Committee approved the agency, it remains to be seen whether legislation will pass; lawmakers are battling over this and other reform proposals floating around Washington.

(3) Higher Monthly Payments
Banks are also demanding bigger and bigger minimum payments. Chase has bumped up the minimum payment for some consumers to 5% of the monthly balance from 2%.
For someone who carries a $5,000 balance, that means the monthly payment of $100 skyrockets to $250 -- a whopping 150% increase.

Consumer Union's Pamela Banks says that her organization has compiled a wealth of anecdotal evidence that indicate such increases in minimum monthly payments are widespread.

"This is making payments virtually impossible for some people," she said. "It's throwing people off when they were living on a tight budget anyway."

Some good news is on the way, however. After February, card companies won't be able to increase monthly minimum payments by more than 100%. For example, a bank cannot increase a 2% minimum payment to any higher than 4%. And this so-called "doubling" will be allowed only once during the life of the card.

(4) Fewer Rewards

Banks are also demanding bigger and bigger minimum payments. Chase has bumped up the minimum payment for some consumers to 5% of the monthly balance from 2%.
For someone who carries a $5,000 balance, that means the monthly payment of $100 skyrockets to $250 -- a whopping 150% increase.

Consumer Union's Pamela Banks says that her organization has compiled a wealth of anecdotal evidence that indicate such increases in minimum monthly payments are widespread.

"This is making payments virtually impossible for some people," she said. "It's throwing people off when they were living on a tight budget anyway."

Some good news is on the way, however. After February, card companies won't be able to increase monthly minimum payments by more than 100%. For example, a bank cannot increase a 2% minimum payment to any higher than 4%. And this so-called "doubling" will be allowed only once during the life of the card.

(5) Slashed Credit Limits and Closed Accounts
Without so much as a call from the bank, some customers are learning their credit limits have been slashed by as much as 75%, or that their accounts have been closed altogether, according to the Center for Responsible Lending's Josh Frank.
Citibank recently closed what a spokesman called a "limited number" of MasterCard gas cards co-branded with Citgo, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Shell.

"People go to make a purchase, and they find out about these huge changes only when they're denied," Frank said. "It's a shock, and it's been happening a lot."

Even cardholders who don't charge anything might find their accounts abruptly closed, Frank said. With credit losses at a record high, companies see inactive cards as a red flag and close the accounts to avoid the worry of future writedowns.

"Usually cardholders have this credit line available for an emergency, for this kind of current economic situation," Frank said. "But now they're turning to it when they need it, and it's gone."

Whats a Cardholder to do?
Consumers must pay close attention to the terms of their contracts, staying alert to any changes.
"It's boring reading, and it can be hard to understand, but that's where everything is spelled out," said Lowcards.com's Hardekopf.

Of course, while there are laws aimed at helping consumers, legislation can't do it all.

"As we close the loopholes on some things, they open up elsewhere," said Consumer Unions' Banks. "Reform acts don't cover everything, and cardholders have to watch out for their own accounts."

And if you don't like your credit card's new terms? "Shop around -- you are not married to your card," Hardekopf said. "It's a partnership, not a lifelong contract."

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Reverse mortgages: Subprime mess déjà vu?


Reverse mortgages are increasingly the go-to solution for retirees confronting insufficient nest eggs and paltry income payouts in today’s low-rate environment. Last year, the number of new Home Equity Conversion Mortgages insured by the federal government amounted to 112,000 — more than 14 times the HECMs that were originated in 2001. The 2009 tally is expected to be even higher.

Last week’s news that 2010 Social Security benefits will not be given a cost-of-living adjustment — for the first time since inflation protection was added to the program in 1975 — will likely fuel demand for reverse mortgages. And lenders on the prowl for post-meltdown revenue sources are eager to boost the supply. The Government Accountability Office reports that 1,500 lenders made their first reverse mortgage in 2008, more than doubling the number of lenders offering these deals.

When done right, reverse mortgages can be a sound financial tool for retirees. But problems abound, as Donna Rosato laid out in "Beware the reverse-mortgage ripoff."

Comptrollor of the Currency John Dugan certainly didn’t soft-pedal his concern in a June address to the American Bankers Association. “While reverse mortgages can provide real benefit," he said, "they also have some of the same characteristics as the riskiest types of subprime mortgages—and that should set off alarm bells.”

The bell is being rung again, this time by the by the National Consumer Law Center in its new report: "Subprime Revisited: How Reverse Mortgage Lenders Put Older Homeowners’ Equity at Risk."
The acknowledged problems in the reverse mortgage market strike me as prime fodder for proponents of establishing a Consumer Financial Protection Agency. Just take a look at the main recommendation made in a recent GAO report on the reverse market:

“To enhance consumer protection from potentially misleading marketing, we recommend that the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development; Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission; Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Comptroller of the Currency, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; and Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, take steps, as appropriate, to strengthen oversight and enhance industry and consumer awareness of the types of marketing claims that we discuss in this report.”

That’s quite an alphabet soup of players with a hand in the game. Yet given the problems that continue to exist, it’s clear the current quilt of oversight has some serious holes. Holes a Consumer Financial Protection Agency might be well-suited to patch.

- Carla Fried CNN Money

Is it time to dump your ARM ?


(Money Magazine) -- If you are among the 6.5 million homeowners who took out a low-rate adjustable-rate mortgage during the housing boom, you've probably spent the past couple of years waiting for your day of reckoning to come.

After all, you've probably heard repeated warnings that when your ARM resets your payments would spike dramatically: an especially big problem if you used a low-rate ARM to stretch for a home you could barely afford.

The good news is that scenario hasn't come to pass. Instead, interest rates have fallen to record lows, and when your ARM resets you'll probably see your monthly nut fall, not rise.

But once the economy stabilizes, the government will start peeling back the policies that are keeping mortgage rates low.

"Eventually rates are going to go up very significantly," says Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. The Mortgage Bankers Association predicts fixed mortgage rates will reach 5.9% by the end of 2010 and 6.3% by the end of 2011.

To see what could happen to your payments later on, look on your mortgage documents to find the cap, or the number of points your rate can move in any given year after the first reset (one or two is typical), as well as the lifetime cap on your loan. Then figure out if you should refinance now and what kind of mortgage you should get if you do.

Stand pat if ...
You plan to move in the next three years. In that case, the few thousand dollars you'll pay to refinance is likely to exceed any extra interest you'll pay on the mortgage before you move.

You have less than 20% equity in your home. If you bought in the past few years and real estate values in your area have taken a big hit, you may not qualify for the best rates. "That makes refinancing less attractive," says Wilton, Conn. mortgage broker Tim Malburg, Homeowners with a jumbo mortgage (more than $417,000 in most areas) are held to an even higher equity standard.

Refi to a 5/1 arm if ...
You'll be in your home for three to five more years. In mid-September, ARMs that were fixed for the first five years cost about half a percentage point less than 30-year fixed-rate loans. Over a five-year period, that could save you almost $10,000 on a $300,000 mortgage.

You have a jumbo loan. These large mortgages can feel like a rip-off right now, since rates for 30-year fixed jumbos are about a percentage point higher than those for smaller loans -- an unusually wide spread, says Keith Gumbinger, vice president at HSH Associates.

That's because the government has been purchasing loans backed by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which has artificially driven down conventional-mortgage rates.

If you need a jumbo mortgage you'd knock about three-quarters of a percentage point off your rate by taking a 5/1 ARM. That would save about $3,300 a year for a half-million-dollar loan.

Refi to a fixed-rate loan if ...
You might be less attractive to a lender later on. If you'll need to take a big loan to pay your kid's college tuition, say, or think you might get laid off -- then it's worth doing the refi while you have the chance.

You'll be in your home five years from now. While most experts think that rates will stay low for a while, they're not likely to get much lower, and there's no guarantee they won't jump unexpectedly.

If you're planning to stay longer than five years, go with a 30-year fixed to eliminate any interest-rate risk, since rates on seven- and 10-year ARMs are only a notch lower than those on 30-year loans. And if you have any doubts about your time frame, lock in. After all, you don't want to be in this same predicament five or so years down the road.

You'll pay more to lock in a fixed-rate mortgage today. But a couple of years from now, holding on to that adjustable-rate loan could get costly.

By Beth Braverman, Money Magazine staff reporter
October 21, 2009: 5:42 AM ET

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Stocks: Know when to hold 'em Know when to fold 'em


Cutting your losses can be emotionally tough. These ground rules can help you overcome your fears.


(Money Magazine) -- After the market dealt you one bad hand after another over the past decade, you may feel relieved that your luck is finally starting to change. Stocks have shot up more than 50% since early March.

But now comes the hard part: deciding if it's time to cut your losses in some shares now that you've at least made up a little ground. There's a strong case for doing at least a little selling. Though you're probably feeling better about your portfolio than you did a year ago, stocks aren't cheap anymore -- not after enjoying their best six-month run since 1938.

And though the economy is improving, the recovery is still shaky. Then there's the fact, rally or not, that your shares likely are worth less than what you paid for them. And with year-end tax-selling season nearing, strategic selling could make sense.

Here are some simple guidelines to help you decide whether to stay at the table or cash in.

Remove the psychological barriers
Maybe you really want to sell, but you've decided not to pull the trigger until you recoup all your losses. This sentiment is so common there's a term for it: loss aversion.

Investors don't like to sell stocks that are down because that would be admitting that their original buy decision was wrong, says Hersh Shefrin, a behavioral finance expert at Santa Clara University. "It's their egos that get in the way."

But the market doesn't care whether you made or lost money in a stock. So forget what you paid -- it has no bearing on the future price.

Take a fresh look
Rather than fixating on your purchase price, consider what the stock is trading for now. Then ask yourself, Would those shares be worth buying anew at today's price?

To answer that, it's useful to compare a stock's current valuation against that of its peers, says Tom Forester, manager of the Forester Value Fund. If a stock's price/earnings ratio -- or an equivalent measure -- climbs above its sector average, Forester will typically sell. "At that point," he says, "we can find better opportunities elsewhere."

Say you own Starbucks (SBUX, Fortune 500). After a huge rally since March, its shares trade at a steep premium to their peers. Yet lattes aren't nearly the growth story they were a few years ago, when consumers didn't think twice about spending $4 for a cup. And the stock is still down more than 30% from late 2004.

At the very least, make sure the reasons for liking a stock are still there. You may have purchased Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) shares years ago, for example, because of its global dominance and earnings potential. But it's a much smaller bank now, and Uncle Sam owns a third of it. Plus the stock has quadrupled since March, yet it's still off more than 90% from its high.

Execute the trade
Once you've decided to pull the plug, you have another decision: dump all at once or sell gradually?

If you've concluded that your portfolio is better off without a stock, the logical response is to sell it all. If you need help getting past the psychological hump of letting go, try the incremental approach.

Unloading, say, a fourth of your position every quarter removes the fear of missing out on a rebound. That fear can be pronounced in a market like this, says John Nofsinger, author of "Investment Madness: How Psychology Affects Your Investing." When stocks are rising, investors fear missing gains, not the risk of suffering losses. "The irony," he says, "is investing becomes riskier after prices have shot higher."

By Janice Revell, Money Magazine senior writer

No 2010 Increase in Social Security


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- There will be no cost-of-living increase for 57 million Social Security beneficiaries next year because consumer prices have fallen, the Social Security Administration announced on Thursday.

It marks the first time that Social Security benefits have not been increased year over year since the cost-of-living adjustment was put into effect in 1975.

To help counterbalance the hit, President Obama is calling on Congress to send another $250 relief payment to seniors and other Americans to stem the economic strain.

"Even as we seek to bring about recovery, we must act on behalf of those hardest hit by this recession," Obama said in a statement Wednesday. "That is why I am announcing my support for an additional $250 in emergency recovery assistance to seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities to help them make it through these difficult times."

Last year, Social Security beneficiaries got a 5.8% cost-of-living adjustment, the largest since 1982, largely because of the spike in energy prices.

"This year, in light of the human need, we need to support President Obama's call for us to make another $250 recovery payment for 57 million Americans," said Commissioner of Social Security Michael J. Astrue in a written statement.

Since there will be no COLA for benefits, the law also prohibits the Social Security Administration from increasing the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax. This year and next, the first $106,800 of a worker's earnings is subject to the 12.4% Social Security tax. Workers typically pay half of that and their employers pay the other half.

It's still not clear yet what if any changes will be made to seniors' Medicare Part B premiums for hospital care next year. The Social Security Administration said in its announcement that if there is an increase that a "hold harmless" provision in the law would protect 93% of Social Security beneficiaries from the increase.

New emergency payment similar to COLA
Obama's proposed $250 payment is roughly equal to a 2% increase in benefits for the average Social Security beneficiary.

Congress approved a similar payment as part of the $787 billion economic recovery act enacted in February.

As with the first $250 recovery payment, the second one would be exempt from income tax, a senior administration official said in a call with reporters on Wednesday.

If approved by Congress, the payments would be sent out in 2010, most likely in the first half. "It wouldn't be late in 2010," the administration official said.

The measure would cost $13 billion over 10 years, according to White House estimates.

The call for increased benefits for seniors is one of several proposals to expand stimulus benefits. Lawmakers are also considering extending unemployment benefits and the homebuyer tax credit, both of which were included in the economic stimulus bill passed in February.

In addition to the $250 emergency payments, the White House has also publicly supported the extension of jobless benefits as well as the extension of subsidies to help the unemployed purchase health insurance under Cobra. The president has not said yet whether he supports the expansion of the homebuyer tax credit.

Where the money will come from
The original $250 relief payment was paid out of general revenue. That would likely be the case for the second payment as well.

Obama specified that he "is committed to ensuring that the $13 billion cost of the proposal does not reduce the solvency of Social Security or other social insurance programs."

That means the $13 billion wouldn't be deducted -- on the balance sheet anyway -- from the payroll taxes collected to pay for Social Security.

But it also won't be paid for by reducing spending or raising revenue in other parts of the budget. Typically economic stimulus is exempt from rules requiring that new measures be paid for.

So if the proposal passes, it will add to the country's annual deficit, which in 2009 was estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to have hit a record high of $1.4 trillion.

First Published: October 14, 2009: 5:00 PM ET

Overdraft fees: Senate gets tough



WASHINGTON (CNNMoney.com) -- Senate leaders on Monday unveiled their proposal to tackle overdraft fees, the penalties banks charge customers who spend more than they have in their accounts.

Echoing legislation offered in the House by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., the Senate bill would require banks to ask customers before enrolling them in overdraft programs. In addition, like the House bill, it would limit the number of overdraft fees charged in a year.

Currently more than 75% of banks automatically sign customers up for overdraft programs, according to a study by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

"At a time when many can afford it least, American consumers are being hit with hundreds of dollars in penalties for overdrawing on their account by just a few dollars," said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Banking Committee. "Banks should not be trying to bolster their profits at the expense of their customers."

But the Senate's bill goes further than the House bill in several areas.

The Senate would give banking regulators new powers to set overdraft fees in a way that is "reasonable and proportional."

It would also prohibits banks from charging fees for insufficient funds on overdrawn ATM and debit card transactions.

The Senate bill also requires banks to disclose to consumers details about how an overdraft charge was incurred and what can be done to fix an account balance on the same day the overdraft fee is charged.

None of those provisions are contained in the House bill.

The Senate bill goes easier on the banks than the House bill in two ways.

First, the Senate bill says banks can charge one customer no more than six overdraft fees a year. The House would cap such fees at three times a year.

Second is the question of whether banks should tell customers when an account is on the verge of being overdrawn, so they can decide whether a purchase is worth an overdraft fee. The House bill would mandate such notification; the Senate bill merely says the issue should be studied.

Banks playing defense
The Senate legislation on overdraft fees is the latest congressional effort in a populist wave against banks. It follows a crackdown on credit card fees and a proposal to create a new consumer protection regulator for financial products like mortgages and credit cards.


The Federal Reserve is also working on new rules that could be ready by year's end that aim to protect consumers against some overdraft protection practices.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., a co-sponsor of the proposed overdraft fee legislation, sent a letter to the Fed last week, saying he was "concerned that your final rules will not do enough to protect consumers."

The Fed is considering allowing banks to continue automatically enrolling consumers but requiring them to give consumers the option of leaving such overdraft protection programs. Schumer wants the Fed to prevent banks from enrolling customers unless they "opt-in."

Some banks have already started to eliminate fees on customers who dip below their balance by a mere $5 or $10. Others plan to cap the number of overdrafts that can be racked up in a day -- Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), for example, is lowering its limit on maximum overdrafts charged daily to four from 10.

JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) will start processing and clearing expenses in the order the purchases were made, chronologically, instead of biggest to smallest, which can deplete bank balance sheets faster and lead to more fees.

Consumer advocates say the push in Washington to tackle overdraft fees prompted banks into making changes.

For their part, banks say they're just responding to customer demands and market forces. Other banks that recently announced changes include: BB&T (BBT, Fortune 500), City National (CYN), Fifth-Third Bancorp (FITB, Fortune 500), PNC (PNC, Fortune 500), Regions Financial (RF, Fortune 500), Toronto-Dominion (TD), U.S. Bancorp (USB, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500).

Scott Talbott, chief lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, said the Senate and House proposals together represent a "huge government intervention into the markets."

"They're largely redundant, because the industry has already made numerous changes to overdraft fees in response to customers concerns," Talbott said.